How We Built ROASBench to Feel Like Real Growth Work
ROASBench was built from operator experience, not benchmark theater. We designed it to feel like real performance marketing: stateful, constrained, path-dependent, and economically unforgiving.
Spring Prompt helps teams define evals, run simulation benchmark packs, compare models, and improve prompts against real outcomes instead of demo vibes.
Hey, can someone review this upgrade email output before I ship it? 👀
Looks fine? Maybe too broad? Search feels risky. Hard to tell. Let's run it and hope for the best.
Watch the magic happen...
Spring Prompt gives you the loop: define what good looks like, measure against real scenarios, and improve the prompt against real outcomes.
Create evals that match the behavior and outcomes you actually care about
Explore the benchmark packs we maintain to see how models behave with tradeoffs, memory, and feedback
Rewrite prompts against your benchmark instead of tweaking blindly
Get clear writeups on model releases and benchmark results that actually matter
Early access launching soon
The workflow is simple: measure usefulness, compare models, improve prompts, and learn from the results.
Define the behaviors you care about, from formatting and correctness to planning quality and audience fit.
Run the same task across multiple models and see who actually performs best under the same constraints.
Track score, ROI, repeat rate, failure modes, and the shape of model behavior over time.
Use benchmark packs like ROASBench to test models inside realistic worlds with state, memory, and consequences.
Organize the scenarios, examples, and benchmark inputs you need to make comparisons consistent and repeatable.
Use eval feedback to rewrite prompts and iterate toward prompts that actually outperform the baseline.
One workflow for measuring and improving real usefulness
Start with your own prompt workflow or one of our benchmark packs like ROASBench.
Set the criteria that define success for your use case, from format to long-horizon judgment.
Compare models inside the same evaluation loop and see the results side by side.
Improve prompts against the benchmark, publish findings, and ship with evidence.
We are building a public library of benchmark packs so people can see which models are genuinely useful, not just polished in demos.
A 12-month DTC growth simulation that tests channel strategy, targeting, ad copy, iteration quality, and long-horizon judgment.
Cold Outreach, Data Analyst, Launch Week, Conversion Doctor, Content Engine, and more are queued up next.
Fridge Roulette, Dropped In, Life Admin, Learn Anything, and Fitness Architect are coming soon.
Everything you need to know
We test both prompt workflows and richer benchmark packs. That ranges from custom evals on your own tasks to simulation-style benchmarks like ROASBench, where a model has to plan, adapt, and make tradeoffs over time.
Each benchmark starts from a seeded world with rules, personas, budgets, and constraints. The model makes decisions, we simulate what happens next, and that updated state becomes the context for the next round.
We store structured state, not just a blob of chat history. Things like budget remaining, audience size, channel memory, brand momentum, offer fatigue, and prior month results all persist and get summarized into working memory for the next decision.
Most tools stop at side-by-side outputs. Spring Prompt is built around usefulness: create evals, run benchmark packs, compare models, and optimize prompts against measurable outcomes instead of taste alone.
Yes. Some packs are being designed so selected human participants can run through the exact same environment, which gives us a useful human benchmark alongside model results.
Expert insights on AI prompt engineering, optimization techniques, and best practices.
ROASBench was built from operator experience, not benchmark theater. We designed it to feel like real performance marketing: stateful, constrained, path-dependent, and economically unforgiving.
ROAS Bench is one of the clearest examples of where frontier models diverge in practice: not on prose quality, but on economic compounding.
If you’re looking for LiteLLM alternatives, you’re usually trying to solve one of two problems: * you need a Python library that makes it easy to switch between LLM providers * you need an AI gateway / routing layer that handles fallbacks, caching, observability, and control That split matters, because the best LiteLLM alternative depends on which problem you actually have. Recent context: On March 24, 2026, LiteLLM disclosed a supply-chain incident affecting malicious PyPI releases 1.82.7
We're in closed beta. Sign up to get early access and be the first to know when spots open up.
We'll never share your email. Unsubscribe anytime.