Independent AI evaluation

Make the AI inside your product measurably better.

We benchmark AI models on real business work and publish everything: results, method and limits. Then we apply the same checks to the AI in your product, so you know what to fix before it ships.

See the benchmarksTalk to us
  • Our own benchmarks
  • Ranges, not just ranks
  • Method on every page
Overall leaderboard · from 8 licensed sources + 5 of our own benchmarks14 Oct 2026
  1. 1Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic
    84
  2. 2GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
    79
  3. 3GPT-6 AstraOpenAI
    78
  4. 4Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle
    75
  5. 5Muse WonderMeta · provisional
    71
  6. 6GPT-6 SolOpenAI
    68
Spring Prompt benchesAgents and tool useKnowledge workWriting and preferenceFactualityFull leaderboard →
Score from 0 to 100. On average 47% of a score comes from our own benchmarks, counting DeckBench and SurveyBench in Knowledge work. Hover, tap or tab to a bar to see what it is made of.
Measured by Spring Prompt

Benchmarks built from real business work.

All benchmarks →
CatalogBench · what we check

One invented claim is enough to make a listing unsafe to publish.

Every listing a model writes is checked against the supplier's copy and the product photos. Claims nobody made fail it. Claims the law makes the seller prove are flagged to check, not failed.

See how each model does →
Listing check · Stackwhistle Stacking BlocksCatalogBench · cb-016
Twelve painted wooden blocks beside their box The model sees the photo and the supplier's copy.

Stackwhistle Wooden Stacking Blocks, 12 Pieces, Multicoloured

  • ✓12 solid beech blocks, from 12 monthsPrinted on the box
  • ✗"Safe for babies and toddlers"A safety claim nobody made: not the supplier, not the box.
  • !"FSC-certified sustainable wood"From the supplier. Check the certificate first.
  • !"Montessori-approved"From the supplier. An endorsement to verify.
Not ready to publish · 1 invented safety claim2 claims to check
Real output from Claude Haiku 4.5 on the sales brief, run 30 September 2026. Synthetic brand and images.
How we work

Start with the decision, not the leaderboard.

  1. 01

    Define

    Agree what good looks like, and which failures must never ship.

  2. 02

    Test

    Run models and prompts on real work. Hard checks first, judgement only where needed.

  3. 03

    Improve

    Fix what the failures point to, then check the fix on cases held back.

  4. 04

    Prove

    A clear call to ship or not, with the evidence and its limits in plain view.

Choosing a model?

Results from 13 licensed sources + 5 of our own benchmarks, each with its method and limits.

Test the AI before your customers do.

Shipping AI in your product? We run the same kind of checks on it, and tell you what to fix first.

Research

Findings and field notes.

All posts →