Compare / qwen3-0.6b vs DeepSeek V3.2 Exp

qwen3-0.6b vs DeepSeek V3.2 Exp

11 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

qwen3-0.6b
Alibaba · profile
DeepSeek V3.2 Exp
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
11
Shared sources
2
BenchmarkMetricqwen3-0.6bDeepSeek V3.2 Exp
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 82.5%93.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 8.6%54.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 3.6%44.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 23.9%56.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 75.0%93.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 71.8%85.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 56.6%76.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 1.0%69.5%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 18.0%25.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.250.35
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 13.154.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.