Compare / qwen3-1.7b vs o4 Mini
qwen3-1.7b vs o4 Mini
11 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | qwen3-1.7b | o4 Mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 76.5% | 87.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 6.0% | 35.3% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 11.0% | 41.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 28.4% | 53.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 81.2% | 81.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 82.9% | 81.3% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 74.6% | 70.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 2.5% | 75.5% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 26.0% | 19.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.38 | 0.33 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 18.8 | 46.9 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.