Compare / Qwen3 14B vs Nova 2 Lite
Qwen3 14B vs Nova 2 Lite
13 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3 14B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 87.2% | 82.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 19.6% | 2.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 34.8% | 2.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 41.0% | 27.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 87.5% | 75.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 89.5% | 87.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 80.0% | 80.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 10.5% | 5.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 20.0% | 45.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.37 | 0.35 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 34.8 | 23.5 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.9% | 99.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 5.4% | 5.1% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.