Compare / Qwen3-14B vs o4-mini

Qwen3-14B vs o4-mini

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 20 results on 4 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3-14B Released 28 Apr 2025 · $0.12 in · $0.24 out
OpenAIo4-mini Released 16 Apr 2025 · $1.10 in · $4.40 out
Qwen3-14B wins 7o4-mini wins 13

Of the 20 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs OpenAI, every model from both labs.

Qwen3-14B or o4-mini? The short answer

Pick o4-mini if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 16.7 against 8.2). Pick Qwen3-14B if cost matters more: it costs 13 times less per token.

  • Qwen3-14B is cheaper: $0.15 against $1.93 per million tokens, 13 times less.
  • o4-mini scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 16.7 against 8.2.
  • Qwen3-14B is newer: released 28 Apr 2025, against 16 Apr 2025 for o4-mini.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3-14B does better for sticking to the facts; o4-mini for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Head to head

8.2
Intelligence Index
16.7
$0.15
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$1.93
131,072
Context window, tokens
200,000

Every fact side by side

Qwen3-14Bo4-mini
Price per million tokens$0.12 in · $0.24 out$1.10 in · $4.40 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.15$1.93
Cheapest host, blended$0.13 (NextBit, INT4)–
Intelligence Index8.216.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window131,072 tokens200,000 tokens
Released28 Apr 2025 (newer)16 Apr 2025
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 122 of 164 48 of 164
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 162 of 198 105 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 130 of 188 101 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 15 of 152 141 of 152

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3-14Bo4-mini
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 194 · 117 of 243 measured 8.2thinking reasoning 16.7high reasoning
GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 181 · 117 of 231 measured 60.4%thinking reasoning 78.4%high reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 202 · 120 of 242 measured 4.5%thinking reasoning 16.5%high reasoning
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4 reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4 · 3 results
Overall accuracy · BFCL% correct, higher is better 34 · 18 of 81 measured 41.0%bfcl fc 53.2%bfcl fc
Irrelevance detection · BFCL% correct, higher is better 20 · 21 of 81 measured 87.2%bfcl prompt 87.2%bfcl prompt
Memory · BFCL% correct, higher is better 33 · 15 of 81 measured 19.6%bfcl fc 35.3%bfcl prompt
UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results
Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 128 · 84 of 230 measured 34.8no reasoning 46.9low reasoning
Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 111 · 99 of 230 measured 20.0%no reasoning 19.0%high reasoning
Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 49 · 140 of 230 measured 0.37no reasoning 0.33low reasoning
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard reported by Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · 2 results
Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better 17 · 95 of 104 measured 5.4% 18.6%high reasoning
Answer rate · Vectara% of documents, higher is better 17 · 59 of 104 measured 99.9% 99.2%high reasoning
Show all 20 results (9 more)
MeasureQwen3-14Bo4-mini
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results
IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 132 · 60 of 195 measured 40.5%thinking reasoning 68.7%high reasoning
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 222 · 138 of 233 measured 0.0%no reasoning 61.0%high reasoning
Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 153 · 110 of 190 measured 5.3%no reasoning 15.2%high reasoning
τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 123 · 97 of 193 measured 34.5%thinking reasoning 55.6%high reasoning
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4 reported by Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4 · 5 results
Multi-turn tasks · BFCL% correct, higher is better 31 · 23 of 81 measured 34.8%bfcl fc 41.8%bfcl fc
Relevance detection · BFCL% correct, higher is better 26 · 36 of 81 measured 87.5%bfcl fc 81.3%bfcl fc
Single-turn calls (curated) · BFCL% correct, higher is better 7 · 59 of 81 measured 89.5%bfcl prompt 81.3%bfcl prompt
Single-turn calls (user-contributed) · BFCL% correct, higher is better 10 · 43 of 81 measured 80.0%bfcl fc 70.8%bfcl prompt
Web search · BFCL% correct, higher is better 37 · 10 of 81 measured 10.5%bfcl prompt 75.5%bfcl fc

Quick answers

Is Qwen3-14B better than o4-mini?

Pick o4-mini if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 16.7 against 8.2). Pick Qwen3-14B if cost matters more: it costs 13 times less per token.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-14B or o4-mini?

Qwen3-14B is cheaper: $0.15 against $1.93 per million tokens, 13 times less.

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3-14B or o4-mini?

o4-mini ranks 48 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 122 for Qwen3-14B.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3-14B or o4-mini?

o4-mini ranks 105 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 162 for Qwen3-14B.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3-14B or o4-mini?

o4-mini ranks 101 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 130 for Qwen3-14B.

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3-14B or o4-mini?

Qwen3-14B ranks 15 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 141 for o4-mini.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3-14B or o4-mini?

o4-mini: 200,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3-14B.

Run Qwen3-14B and o4-mini on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.

Try the playgroundTalk to us