Compare / Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 Released 21 Jul 2025 · $0.15 in · $0.75 out
AlibabaQwen3.5-122B-A10B Released 24 Feb 2026 · $0.26 in · $2.08 out
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 wins 27 too close to callQwen3.5-122B-A10B wins 8

Of the 17 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5).

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B? The short answer

Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 17.7 against 12.0). Pick Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 if cost matters more: it costs 2.4 times less per token.

  • Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is cheaper: $0.30 against $0.72 per million tokens, 2.4 times less.
  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 17.7 against 12.0.
  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is newer: released 24 Feb 2026, against 21 Jul 2025 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 does better for writing; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for reasoning and knowledge.

Head to head

12.0
Intelligence Index
17.7
$0.30
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$0.72
262,144
Context window, tokens
262,144

Every fact side by side

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Price per million tokens$0.15 in · $0.75 out$0.26 in · $2.08 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.30$0.72
Cheapest host, blended$0.15 (GMICloud, FP8)$0.72 (Alibaba)
Intelligence Index12.017.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–147
Context window262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Released21 Jul 202524 Feb 2026 (newer)
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinaChina

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 51 of 164 95 of 164
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 129 of 198 87 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 85 of 188 102 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 98 of 152 108 of 152

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 109 · 117 of 387 measured 1,422 1,416
Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 94 · 103 of 163 measured 1,431 1,428
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 97 · 105 of 380 measured 1,432 1,422
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 153 · 114 of 243 measured 12.0 17.7no reasoning
GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 136 · 75 of 231 measured 75.3% 85.7%
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 144 · 92 of 242 measured 11.1% 25.2%
UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results
Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 80 · 112 of 230 measured 49.0 39.5no reasoning
Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 69 · 33 of 230 measured 15.0% 9.0%thinking reasoning
Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 64 · 83 of 230 measured 0.36 0.36no reasoning
Show all 17 results (8 more)
MeasureQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 122 · 136 of 385 measured 1,378 1,366
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 103 · 111 of 338 measured 1,447 1,442
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 104 · 115 of 387 measured 1,414 1,406
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 115 · 125 of 386 measured 1,396 1,387
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results
IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 113 · 22 of 195 measured 46.1% 75.7%
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 177 · 72 of 233 measured 33.9% 76.3%
Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 110 · 65 of 190 measured 15.2% 31.1%
τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 127 · 30 of 193 measured 33.3% 93.6%

Quick answers

Is Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 better than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 17.7 against 12.0). Pick Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 if cost matters more: it costs 2.4 times less per token.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is cheaper: $0.30 against $0.72 per million tokens, 2.4 times less.

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ranks 51 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 95 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks 87 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 129 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ranks 85 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 102 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ranks 98 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 108 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Run Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.