Compare / Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 Released 21 Jul 2025 · $0.15 in · $0.75 out
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Released 19 Feb 2026 · $2.00 in · $12.00 out
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 wins 2Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 15

Of the 17 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs Google, every model from both labs.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview? The short answer

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 29.7 against 12.0). Pick Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 if cost matters more: it costs 15 times less per token.

  • Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is cheaper: $0.30 against $4.50 per million tokens, 15 times less.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 29.7 against 12.0.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is newer: released 19 Feb 2026, against 21 Jul 2025 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview does better for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Head to head

12.0
Intelligence Index
29.7
$0.30
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$4.50
262,144
Context window, tokens
1,048,576

Every fact side by side

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Price per million tokens$0.15 in · $0.75 out$2.00 in · $12.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.30$4.50
Cheapest host, blended$0.15 (GMICloud, FP8)$4.50 (Google)
Cached input, per million–$0.20 cached input
Intelligence Index12.029.7
Spring Prompt overall–49
Output speed, tokens a second–120
Context window262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Released21 Jul 202519 Feb 2026 (newer)
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Product listingsTurning a sparse product feed and photos into listings that can go live not measured 8 of 20
Decks from an analysisTurning a finished analysis into a deck you could present as it is not measured 13 of 19
User surveysPlanning a user survey and reading its results without being misled not measured 5 of 8
Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending not measured 9 of 19
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 51 of 164 61 of 164
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 36 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 129 of 198 24 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 85 of 188 9 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 98 of 152 34 of 152
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) not measured 5 of 23

From our research

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 109 · 15 of 387 measured 1,422 1,487
Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 94 · 21 of 163 measured 1,431 1,472
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 97 · 23 of 380 measured 1,432 1,477
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 153 · 52 of 243 measured 12.0 29.7
GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 136 · 5 of 231 measured 75.3% 94.1%
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 144 · 16 of 242 measured 11.1% 47.0%
UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results
Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 80 · 5 of 230 measured 49.0 72.2low reasoning
Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 69 · 99 of 230 measured 15.0% 19.0%low reasoning
Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 64 · 122 of 230 measured 0.36 0.34low reasoning
Show all 17 results (8 more)
MeasureQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 122 · 10 of 385 measured 1,378 1,480
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 103 · 26 of 338 measured 1,447 1,509
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 104 · 17 of 387 measured 1,414 1,480
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 115 · 11 of 386 measured 1,396 1,480
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results
IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 113 · 13 of 195 measured 46.1% 77.1%
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 177 · 24 of 233 measured 33.9% 82.0%
Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 110 · 8 of 190 measured 15.2% 53.8%
τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 127 · 16 of 193 measured 33.3% 95.6%

Quick answers

Is Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 29.7 against 12.0). Pick Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 if cost matters more: it costs 15 times less per token.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is cheaper: $0.30 against $4.50 per million tokens, 15 times less.

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ranks 51 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 61 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks 24 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 129 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks 9 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 85 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks 34 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 98 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Run Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.

Try the playgroundTalk to us