Compare / Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 14 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Of the 14 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs Google, every model from both labs.
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.8 Flash? The short answer
Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 40.9 against 12.0). Pick Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 if cost matters more: it costs 10 times less per token.
- Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is cheaper: $0.30 against $3.00 per million tokens, 10 times less.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 40.9 against 12.0.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash is newer: released 2 Sep 2026, against 21 Jul 2025 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Gemini 3.8 Flash does better for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 | Gemini 3.8 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.15 in · $0.75 out | $1.50 in · $7.50 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.30 | $3.00 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.15 (GMICloud, FP8) | $1.50 (Google) |
| Intelligence Index | 12.0 | 40.9 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | 61 |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | 147 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens |
| Released | 21 Jul 2025 | 2 Sep 2026 (newer) |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Developer based in | China | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
From our research
- We Told 11 AI Models What Happened in 2026. Most of Them Thought We Were Making It Up. 12 Oct 2026
- We Tested the Anatomy Claude Code Skill on Five Everyday Objects and Seven AI Models 12 Oct 2026
- Claude Haiku 5.5 Is Far Better Than Haiku 4.5 at a Tenth of the Price. GPT-6 Luna Still Beats It at Business Work. 8 Oct 2026
- Mistral Large 4 Is Fast, Cheap and Europe's Best Model. On Business Work, It Still Makes Things Up. 7 Oct 2026
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 109 · 7 of 387 measured | 1,422 | 1,495high reasoning |
| Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 94 · 16 of 163 measured | 1,431 | 1,477high reasoning |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 97 · 21 of 380 measured | 1,432 | 1,481high reasoning |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 153 · 22 of 243 measured | 12.0 | 40.9high reasoning |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 136 · 2 of 231 measured | 75.3% | 95.3%high reasoning |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 144 · 15 of 242 measured | 11.1% | 47.8%high reasoning |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 80 · 1 of 230 measured | 49.0 | 78.6medium reasoning |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 69 · 57 of 230 measured | 15.0% | 13.0%high reasoning |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 64 · 132 of 230 measured | 0.36 | 0.34high reasoning |
Show all 14 results (5 more)
| Measure | Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 | Gemini 3.8 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results | ||
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 122 · 7 of 385 measured | 1,378 | 1,485high reasoning |
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 103 · 13 of 338 measured | 1,447 | 1,526high reasoning |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 104 · 12 of 387 measured | 1,414 | 1,486high reasoning |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 115 · 8 of 386 measured | 1,396 | 1,487high reasoning |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 1 result | ||
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 177 · 6 of 233 measured | 33.9% | 84.0%medium reasoning |
Compare them with other models
Quick answers
Is Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 better than Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 40.9 against 12.0). Pick Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 if cost matters more: it costs 10 times less per token.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is cheaper: $0.30 against $3.00 per million tokens, 10 times less.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks 31 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 51 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks 12 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 129 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.
Which is better for writing, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks 2 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 85 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.
Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Gemini 3.8 Flash ranks 12 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 98 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or Gemini 3.8 Flash?
Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.
Run Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 and Gemini 3.8 Flash on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.