Compare / Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 vs gpt-oss-120b

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 vs gpt-oss-120b

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 Released 21 Jul 2025 · $0.15 in · $0.75 out
OpenAIgpt-oss-120b Released 5 Aug 2025 · $0.15 in · $0.60 out
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 wins 11gpt-oss-120b wins 6

Of the 17 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs OpenAI, every model from both labs.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or gpt-oss-120b? The short answer

They score and cost about the same: pick on the results below that match your work.

  • They cost about the same: $0.30 and $0.26 per million tokens (three input to one output).
  • They score about the same on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (12.0 and 11.6).
  • gpt-oss-120b is newer: released 5 Aug 2025, against 21 Jul 2025 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 does better for writing and sticking to the facts; gpt-oss-120b for reasoning and knowledge.

Head to head

12.0
Intelligence Index
11.6
$0.30
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$0.26
262,144
Context window, tokens
131,072

Every fact side by side

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507gpt-oss-120b
Price per million tokens$0.15 in · $0.75 out$0.15 in · $0.60 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.30$0.26
Cheapest host, blended$0.15 (GMICloud, FP8)$0.065 (CoreWeave, FP4)
Intelligence Index12.011.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–188
Context window262,144 tokens131,072 tokens
Released21 Jul 20255 Aug 2025 (newer)
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 51 of 164 120 of 164
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 49 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 129 of 198 114 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 85 of 188 133 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 98 of 152 139 of 152

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507gpt-oss-120b
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 109 · 187 of 387 measured 1,422 1,352
Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 94 · 142 of 163 measured 1,431 1,385
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 97 · 183 of 380 measured 1,432 1,352
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 153 · 157 of 243 measured 12.0 11.6high reasoning
GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 136 · 118 of 231 measured 75.3% 78.2%high reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 144 · 110 of 242 measured 11.1% 19.6%high reasoning
UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results
Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 80 · 116 of 230 measured 49.0 38.5medium reasoning
Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 69 · 224 of 230 measured 15.0% 107.0%medium reasoning
Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 64 · 217 of 230 measured 0.36 0.29medium reasoning
Show all 17 results (8 more)
MeasureQwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507gpt-oss-120b
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 122 · 238 of 385 measured 1,378 1,278
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 103 · 188 of 338 measured 1,447 1,357
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 104 · 204 of 387 measured 1,414 1,323
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 115 · 215 of 386 measured 1,396 1,309
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results
IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 113 · 58 of 195 measured 46.1% 69.0%high reasoning
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 177 · 152 of 233 measured 33.9% 52.0%high reasoning
Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 110 · 84 of 190 measured 15.2% 23.5%high reasoning
τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 127 · 86 of 193 measured 33.3% 65.8%high reasoning

Quick answers

Is Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 better than gpt-oss-120b?

They score and cost about the same: pick on the results below that match your work.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or gpt-oss-120b?

They cost about the same: $0.30 and $0.26 per million tokens (three input to one output).

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or gpt-oss-120b?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ranks 51 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 120 for gpt-oss-120b.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or gpt-oss-120b?

gpt-oss-120b ranks 114 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 129 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or gpt-oss-120b?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ranks 85 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 133 for gpt-oss-120b.

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or gpt-oss-120b?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ranks 98 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 139 for gpt-oss-120b.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or gpt-oss-120b?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507: 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for gpt-oss-120b.

Run Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 and gpt-oss-120b on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.

Try the playgroundTalk to us