Compare / Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V3.1

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs DeepSeek V3.1

16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Alibaba · profile
DeepSeek V3.1
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507DeepSeek V3.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4041,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3701,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4661,432
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3851,416
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4001,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3771,407
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 12.713.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 79.0%77.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 15.9%14.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 51.2%41.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 72.0%56.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 13.6%25.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 53.2%37.4%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 30.0%30.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.310.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 32.451.9

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.