Compare / Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Muse Spark 1.2

16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Alibaba · profile
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Muse Spark 1.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4041,519
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3701,448
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4661,502
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3851,475
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4001,496
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3771,472
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 22.172.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 12.739.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 79.0%90.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 15.9%45.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 72.0%79.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 41.4%57.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 12.0%80.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%7.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 7.8%34.8%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 40.4%60.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.