Compare / Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Kimi K2.7 Code
14 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 22.1 | 60.8 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 12.7 | 25.8 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 79.0% | 89.6% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 15.9% | 35.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 51.2% | 63.1% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 72.0% | 79.3% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | SciCode% of problems | 41.4% | 47.8% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 12.0% | 67.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks | 0.0% | 1.0% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 13.6% | 44.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 7.8% | 20.2% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 53.2% | 90.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 40.4% | 36.5% |
| Vending-Bench 2reported | Money after a yearUS dollars | $-11.34 | $5,082.94 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.