Compare / Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Of the 16 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5).
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B? The short answer
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 17.7 against 7.5). Pick Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 if cost matters more: it costs 5.0 times less per token.
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 is cheaper: $0.14 against $0.72 per million tokens, 5.0 times less.
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 17.7 against 7.5.
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is newer: released 24 Feb 2026, against 29 Jul 2025 for Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does better for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.090 in · $0.30 out | $0.26 in · $2.08 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.14 | $0.72 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.084 (StreamLake) | $0.72 (Alibaba) |
| Intelligence Index | 7.5 | 17.7 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | 147 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Released | 29 Jul 2025 | 24 Feb 2026 (newer) |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | China | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 162 · 117 of 387 measured | 1,383 | 1,416 |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 144 · 105 of 380 measured | 1,397 | 1,422 |
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 186 · 136 of 385 measured | 1,319 | 1,366 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 209 · 114 of 243 measured | 7.5 | 17.7no reasoning |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 172 · 75 of 231 measured | 65.9% | 85.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 173 · 92 of 242 measured | 6.9% | 25.2% |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 163 · 112 of 230 measured | 27.9 | 39.5no reasoning |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 57 · 33 of 230 measured | 13.0% | 9.0%thinking reasoning |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 187 · 83 of 230 measured | 0.31 | 0.36no reasoning |
Show all 16 results (7 more)
| Measure | Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 163 · 111 of 338 measured | 1,395 | 1,442 |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 164 · 115 of 387 measured | 1,367 | 1,406 |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 176 · 125 of 386 measured | 1,342 | 1,387 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results | ||
| IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 168 · 22 of 195 measured | 33.1% | 75.7% |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 191 · 72 of 233 measured | 26.3% | 76.3% |
| Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 147 · 65 of 190 measured | 6.1% | 31.1% |
| τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 185 · 30 of 193 measured | 10.2% | 93.6% |
Quick answers
Is Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 better than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 17.7 against 7.5). Pick Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 if cost matters more: it costs 5.0 times less per token.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 is cheaper: $0.14 against $0.72 per million tokens, 5.0 times less.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 ranks 75 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 95 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks 87 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 159 for Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507.
Which is better for writing, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks 102 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 140 for Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507.
Run Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.