Compare / Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Nova 2 Lite
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Nova 2 Lite
17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,397 | 1,351 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,319 | 1,269 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,395 | 1,354 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,366 | 1,327 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,383 | 1,335 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,342 | 1,298 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 79.9% | 82.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 17.6% | 2.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 30.0% | 2.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 41.4% | 27.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 93.8% | 75.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 88.9% | 87.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 78.4% | 80.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 22.5% | 5.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 13.0% | 45.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.31 | 0.35 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 27.9 | 23.5 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.