Compare / Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-4.1

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-4.1

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Alibaba · profile
GPT-4.1
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507GPT-4.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3971,415
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3191,402
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3951,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3661,403
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3831,415
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3421,405
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 79.9%86.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 17.6%23.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 30.0%38.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 41.4%54.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 93.8%100.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 88.9%88.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 78.4%78.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 22.5%68.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 13.0%6.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.310.33
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 27.967.5

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.