Compare / Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Grok 4 Fast (reasoning)

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Grok 4 Fast (reasoning)

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 Released 29 Jul 2025 · $0.090 in · $0.30 out
xAIGrok 4 Fast (reasoning) Released 19 Sep 2025 · Not on sale
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 wins 12 too close to callGrok 4 Fast (reasoning) wins 13

Of the 16 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs xAI, every model from both labs.

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 or Grok 4 Fast (reasoning)? The short answer

Pick Grok 4 Fast (reasoning): it scores higher (Intelligence Index 17.9 against 7.5) at about the same price.

  • Grok 4 Fast (reasoning) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 17.9 against 7.5.
  • Grok 4 Fast (reasoning) is newer: released 19 Sep 2025, against 29 Jul 2025 for Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Grok 4 Fast (reasoning) does better for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Head to head

7.5
Intelligence Index
17.9

Every fact side by side

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507Grok 4 Fast (reasoning)
Price per million tokens$0.090 in · $0.30 outNot on sale
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.14–
Cheapest host, blended$0.084 (StreamLake)–
Intelligence Index7.517.9
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window262,144 tokens–
Released29 Jul 202519 Sep 2025 (newer)
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 75 of 164 not measured
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 159 of 198 96 of 199
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 140 of 188 88 of 189
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers not measured 133 of 153

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507Grok 4 Fast (reasoning)
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 162 · 132 of 387 measured 1,383 1,405
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 144 · 138 of 380 measured 1,397 1,403
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 186 · 115 of 385 measured 1,319 1,383
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 209 · 113 of 243 measured 7.5 17.9
GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 172 · 81 of 231 measured 65.9% 84.7%
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 173 · 113 of 242 measured 6.9% 19.1%
UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results
Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 163 · 69 of 230 measured 27.9 53.4
Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 57 · 134 of 230 measured 13.0% 23.0%
Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 187 · 155 of 230 measured 0.31 0.33
Show all 16 results (7 more)
MeasureQwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507Grok 4 Fast (reasoning)
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 163 · 132 of 338 measured 1,395 1,421
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 164 · 137 of 387 measured 1,367 1,388
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 176 · 123 of 386 measured 1,342 1,388
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results
IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 168 · 104 of 195 measured 33.1% 50.5%
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 191 · 90 of 233 measured 26.3% 73.7%
Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 147 · 94 of 190 measured 6.1% 18.9%
τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 185 · 86 of 193 measured 10.2% 65.8%

Quick answers

Is Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 better than Grok 4 Fast (reasoning)?

Pick Grok 4 Fast (reasoning): it scores higher (Intelligence Index 17.9 against 7.5) at about the same price.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 or Grok 4 Fast (reasoning)?

Grok 4 Fast (reasoning) ranks 96 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 159 for Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 or Grok 4 Fast (reasoning)?

Grok 4 Fast (reasoning) ranks 88 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 140 for Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507.

Run Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 and Grok 4 Fast (reasoning) on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.