Compare / Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
11 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,340 | 1,367 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,304 | 1,326 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,398 | 1,394 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,331 | 1,359 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,347 | 1,369 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,308 | 1,341 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 19.0% | 67.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.32 | 0.28 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 33.0 | 27.2 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.9% | 94.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 5.9% | 9.3% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.