Compare / Qwen3 32B vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Qwen3 32B vs Claude Haiku 4.5
19 results from 4 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3 32B | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,340 | 1,420 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,304 | 1,387 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,398 | 1,452 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,331 | 1,415 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,347 | 1,414 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,308 | 1,399 |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 82.4% | 95.3% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 26.7% | 54.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 47.9% | 53.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 48.7% | 68.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 93.8% | 62.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 90.3% | 86.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 82.0% | 78.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 26.0% | 83.5% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 19.0% | 6.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.32 | 0.39 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 33.0 | 52.2 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.9% | 99.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 5.9% | 9.8% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.