Compare / Qwen3 32B vs gemini-3-pro-preview
Qwen3 32B vs gemini-3-pro-preview
13 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3 32B | gemini-3-pro-preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Irrelevance detection% correct | 82.4% | 85.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Memory% correct | 26.7% | 61.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Multi-turn tasks% correct | 47.9% | 63.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Overall accuracy% correct | 48.7% | 72.5% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Relevance detection% correct | 93.8% | 75.0% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (curated)% correct | 90.3% | 90.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Single-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct | 82.0% | 83.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reported | Web search% correct | 26.0% | 80.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Requested-length error% off the requested word count | 19.0% | 33.0% |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Style adherencescore from 0 to 1 | 0.32 | 0.37 |
| UGI Leaderboardreported | Writing scorescore out of 100 | 33.0 | 66.7 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.9% | 99.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 5.9% | 13.6% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.