Compare / Qwen3 32B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Qwen3 32B vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3 32B
Alibaba · profile
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3 32BLlama 3.2 3B Instruct
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,3401,146
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3041,145
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,3981,179
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3311,146
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3471,167
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3081,143
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedIrrelevance detection% correct 82.4%52.1%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMemory% correct 26.7%6.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedMulti-turn tasks% correct 47.9%4.0%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedOverall accuracy% correct 48.7%21.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedRelevance detection% correct 93.8%87.5%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (curated)% correct 90.3%82.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedSingle-turn calls (user-contributed)% correct 82.0%58.3%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) V4reportedWeb search% correct 26.0%1.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 19.0%31.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.320.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 33.010.4

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.