Compare / Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Claude Sonnet 4

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Claude Sonnet 4

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 21 results on 4 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3.5-122B-A10B Released 24 Feb 2026 · $0.26 in · $2.08 out
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4 Released 22 May 2025 · $3.00 in · $15.00 out
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins 104 too close to callClaude Sonnet 4 wins 7

Of the 21 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs Anthropic, every model from both labs.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Claude Sonnet 4? The short answer

They score about the same, so pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: it costs 8.4 times less per token.

  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper: $0.72 against $6.00 per million tokens, 8.4 times less.
  • Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 18.9 against 17.7.
  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is newer: released 24 Feb 2026, against 22 May 2025 for Claude Sonnet 4.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does better for reasoning and knowledge; Claude Sonnet 4 for sticking to the facts.

Head to head

17.7
Intelligence Index
18.9
$0.72
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$6.00
262,144
Context window, tokens
200,000

Every fact side by side

Qwen3.5-122B-A10BClaude Sonnet 4
Price per million tokens$0.26 in · $2.08 out$3.00 in · $15.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.72$6.00
Cheapest host, blended$0.72 (Alibaba)$6.00 (Amazon Bedrock)
Intelligence Index17.718.9
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second147–
Context window262,144 tokens200,000 tokens
Released24 Feb 2026 (newer)22 May 2025
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 95 of 164 83 of 164
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 87 of 198 115 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 102 of 188 68 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 108 of 152 88 of 152

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3.5-122B-A10BClaude Sonnet 4
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 117 · 136 of 387 measured 1,416 1,402thinking-32k reasoning
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 105 · 153 of 380 measured 1,422 1,387
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 136 · 98 of 385 measured 1,366 1,396thinking-32k reasoning
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 114 · 109 of 243 measured 17.7no reasoning 18.9thinking reasoning
GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 75 · 122 of 231 measured 85.7% 77.7%thinking reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 92 · 148 of 242 measured 25.2% 10.7%thinking reasoning
UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results
Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 112 · 32 of 230 measured 39.5no reasoning 63.7no reasoning
Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 33 · 13 of 230 measured 9.0%thinking reasoning 4.0%no reasoning
Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 83 · 76 of 230 measured 0.36no reasoning 0.36no reasoning
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard reported by Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · 2 results
Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better 72 · 60 of 104 measured 11.2% 10.3%
Answer rate · Vectara% of documents, higher is better 31 · 72 of 104 measured 99.8% 98.6%
Show all 21 results (10 more)
MeasureQwen3.5-122B-A10BClaude Sonnet 4
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 111 · 120 of 338 measured 1,442 1,433thinking-32k reasoning
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 115 · 100 of 387 measured 1,406 1,415thinking-32k reasoning
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 125 · 111 of 386 measured 1,387 1,398thinking-32k reasoning
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 7 results
Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better 64 · 77 of 130 measured 47.6% 36.3%thinking reasoning
τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better 58 · 54 of 121 measured 15.3% 16.7%thinking reasoning
Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score, higher is better 65 · 78 of 131 measured 45.7 37.6thinking reasoning
IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 22 · 91 of 195 measured 75.7% 54.7%thinking reasoning
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 72 · 107 of 233 measured 76.3% 70.3%thinking reasoning
Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 65 · 65 of 190 measured 31.1% 31.1%thinking reasoning
τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 30 · 90 of 193 measured 93.6% 64.6%thinking reasoning

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than Claude Sonnet 4?

They score about the same, so pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: it costs 8.4 times less per token.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Claude Sonnet 4?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper: $0.72 against $6.00 per million tokens, 8.4 times less.

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Claude Sonnet 4?

Claude Sonnet 4 ranks 83 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 95 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Claude Sonnet 4?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks 87 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 115 for Claude Sonnet 4.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Claude Sonnet 4?

Claude Sonnet 4 ranks 68 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 102 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Claude Sonnet 4?

Claude Sonnet 4 ranks 88 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 108 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Claude Sonnet 4?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Sonnet 4.

Run Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Claude Sonnet 4 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.

Try the playgroundTalk to us