Compare / Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 19 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3.5-122B-A10B Released 24 Feb 2026 · $0.26 in · $2.08 out
GoogleGemini 3.7 Flash Released 13 Aug 2026 · $1.50 in · $7.50 out
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins 1Gemini 3.7 Flash wins 18

Of the 19 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs Google, every model from both labs.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Gemini 3.7 Flash? The short answer

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 39.6 against 17.7). Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if cost matters more: it costs 4.2 times less per token.

  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper: $0.72 against $3.00 per million tokens, 4.2 times less.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 39.6 against 17.7.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash is newer: released 13 Aug 2026, against 24 Feb 2026 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Gemini 3.7 Flash does better for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Head to head

17.7
Intelligence Index
39.6
$0.72
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$3.00
262,144
Context window, tokens
1,048,576

Every fact side by side

Qwen3.5-122B-A10BGemini 3.7 Flash
Price per million tokens$0.26 in · $2.08 out$1.50 in · $7.50 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.72$3.00
Cheapest host, blended$0.72 (Alibaba)$1.50 (Google)
Intelligence Index17.739.6
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second147–
Context window262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Released24 Feb 202613 Aug 2026 (newer)
WeightsOpenClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 95 of 164 29 of 164
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 12 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 87 of 198 14 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 102 of 188 6 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 108 of 152 13 of 152

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3.5-122B-A10BGemini 3.7 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 117 · 14 of 387 measured 1,416 1,488high reasoning
Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 103 · 15 of 163 measured 1,428 1,477high reasoning
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 105 · 18 of 380 measured 1,422 1,483high reasoning
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 114 · 27 of 243 measured 17.7no reasoning 39.6medium reasoning
GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 75 · 4 of 231 measured 85.7% 94.5%high reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 92 · 13 of 242 measured 25.2% 47.9%high reasoning
UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results
Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 112 · 2 of 230 measured 39.5no reasoning 77.5medium reasoning
Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 33 · 21 of 230 measured 9.0%thinking reasoning 7.0%medium reasoning
Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 83 · 159 of 230 measured 0.36no reasoning 0.33medium reasoning
Show all 19 results (10 more)
MeasureQwen3.5-122B-A10BGemini 3.7 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 136 · 5 of 385 measured 1,366 1,493high reasoning
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 111 · 23 of 338 measured 1,442 1,511high reasoning
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 115 · 14 of 387 measured 1,406 1,485high reasoning
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 125 · 6 of 386 measured 1,387 1,496high reasoning
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 6 results
Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better 64 · 10 of 130 measured 47.6% 85.8%high reasoning
Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks, higher is better 66 · 31 of 112 measured 0.0% 13.6%high reasoning
τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better 58 · 25 of 121 measured 15.3% 35.5%medium reasoning
Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score, higher is better 65 · 12 of 131 measured 45.7 76.1high reasoning
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 72 · 15 of 233 measured 76.3% 83.0%medium reasoning
SciCode% of problems, higher is better 79 · 7 of 113 measured 39.7% 59.8%medium reasoning

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 39.6 against 17.7). Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if cost matters more: it costs 4.2 times less per token.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is cheaper: $0.72 against $3.00 per million tokens, 4.2 times less.

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks 29 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 95 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks 14 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 87 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks 6 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 102 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash ranks 13 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 108 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Run Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Gemini 3.7 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.

Try the playgroundTalk to us