Compare / Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Phi 4

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Phi 4

11 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Alibaba · profile
Phi 4
Microsoft · profile
Results compared
11
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.5-122B-A10BPhi 4
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4221,256
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3661,210
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4421,268
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4061,245
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4161,256
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3871,229
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 9.0%19.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.360.34
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 39.525.7
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.8%80.7%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 11.2%3.7%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.