Compare / Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 26 results on 4 sources that measured both models.
Of the 26 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5).
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B? The short answer
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 17.7 against 8.9). Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B if cost matters more: it costs 8.2 times less per token. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is also faster.
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper: $0.088 against $0.72 per million tokens, 8.2 times less.
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 17.7 against 8.9.
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B writes faster: 223 tokens a second against 147.
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is newer: released 24 Feb 2026, against 15 Dec 2025 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does better for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.26 in · $2.08 out | $0.050 in · $0.20 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.72 | $0.088 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.72 (Alibaba) | $0.088 (DeepInfra, FP4) |
| Intelligence Index | 17.7 | 8.9 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 147 | 223 |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Released | 24 Feb 2026 (newer) | 15 Dec 2025 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | China | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 117 · 242 of 387 measured | 1,416 | 1,314 |
| Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 103 · 155 of 163 measured | 1,428 | 1,362 |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 105 · 223 of 380 measured | 1,422 | 1,317 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 114 · 185 of 243 measured | 17.7no reasoning | 8.9thinking reasoning |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 75 · 135 of 231 measured | 85.7% | 75.7%thinking reasoning |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 92 · 143 of 242 measured | 25.2% | 11.4%thinking reasoning |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 112 · 173 of 230 measured | 39.5no reasoning | 25.9 |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 33 · 180 of 230 measured | 9.0%thinking reasoning | 35.0% |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 83 · 221 of 230 measured | 0.36no reasoning | 0.28 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard reported by Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · 2 results | ||
| Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better 72 · 55 of 104 measured | 11.2% | 9.6% |
| Answer rate · Vectara% of documents, higher is better 31 · 45 of 104 measured | 99.8% | 99.6% |
Show all 26 results (15 more)
| Measure | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results | ||
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 136 · 273 of 385 measured | 1,366 | 1,242 |
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 111 · 208 of 338 measured | 1,442 | 1,331 |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 115 · 247 of 387 measured | 1,406 | 1,291 |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 125 · 270 of 386 measured | 1,387 | 1,267 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 11 results | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better 64 · 107 of 130 measured | 47.6% | 6.7%thinking reasoning |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks, higher is better 66 · 66 of 112 measured | 0.0% | 0.0%thinking reasoning |
| τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better 58 · 97 of 121 measured | 15.3% | 6.0%thinking reasoning |
| Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score, higher is better 65 · 113 of 131 measured | 45.7 | 14.4thinking reasoning |
| IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 22 · 49 of 195 measured | 75.7% | 71.1%thinking reasoning |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 72 · 172 of 233 measured | 76.3% | 38.0%thinking reasoning |
| Output speedtokens per second, higher is better 21 · 8 of 74 measured | 147no reasoning | 223no reasoning |
| SciCode% of problems, higher is better 79 · 101 of 113 measured | 39.7% | 30.6%thinking reasoning |
| Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 65 · 116 of 190 measured | 31.1% | 13.6%thinking reasoning |
| Time to first answer tokenseconds, lower is better 29 · 5 of 74 measured | 1.05no reasoning | 0.45no reasoning |
| τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 30 · 115 of 193 measured | 93.6% | 40.9%thinking reasoning |
Quick answers
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 17.7 against 8.9). Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B if cost matters more: it costs 8.2 times less per token. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is also faster.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper: $0.088 against $0.72 per million tokens, 8.2 times less.
Which is faster, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B writes about 223 tokens a second on its usual API, against 147 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (Artificial Analysis).
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks 95 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 148 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks 87 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 133 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
Which is better for writing, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks 102 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 170 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks 108 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 120 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
Run Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.