Compare / Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning)
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning)
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 12 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Of the 12 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs xAI, every model from both labs.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning)? The short answer
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 17.7 against 11.1) at about the same price.
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 17.7 against 11.1.
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is newer: released 24 Feb 2026, against 19 Sep 2025 for Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning).
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does better for reasoning and knowledge and sticking to the facts; Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning) for writing.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.26 in · $2.08 out | Not on sale |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.72 | – |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.72 (Alibaba) | – |
| Intelligence Index | 17.7 | 11.1 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | 147 | – |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | – |
| Released | 24 Feb 2026 (newer) | 19 Sep 2025 |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Developer based in | China | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 114 · 163 of 243 measured | 17.7no reasoning | 11.1no reasoning |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 75 · 180 of 231 measured | 85.7% | 60.6%no reasoning |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 92 · 202 of 242 measured | 25.2% | 4.5%no reasoning |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 112 · 95 of 230 measured | 39.5no reasoning | 43.0 |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 33 · 99 of 230 measured | 9.0%thinking reasoning | 19.0% |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 83 · 159 of 230 measured | 0.36no reasoning | 0.33 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard reported by Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · 2 results | ||
| Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better 72 · 98 of 104 measured | 11.2% | 19.7% |
| Answer rate · Vectara% of documents, higher is better 31 · 59 of 104 measured | 99.8% | 99.2% |
Show all 12 results (4 more)
| Measure | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results | ||
| IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 22 · 148 of 195 measured | 75.7% | 37.7%no reasoning |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 72 · 195 of 233 measured | 76.3% | 24.0%no reasoning |
| Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 65 · 124 of 190 measured | 31.1% | 12.1%no reasoning |
| τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 30 · 91 of 193 measured | 93.6% | 63.7%no reasoning |
Compare them with other models
Quick answers
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning)?
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 17.7 against 11.1) at about the same price.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning)?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks 87 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 157 for Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning).
Which is better for writing, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning)?
Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning) ranks 93 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 102 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning)?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ranks 108 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 146 for Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning).
Run Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Grok 4 Fast (non-reasoning) on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.