Compare / Qwen3.5-27B vs Kimi K2 (0711)
Qwen3.5-27B vs Kimi K2 (0711)
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Of the 16 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs Moonshot AI, every model from both labs.
Qwen3.5-27B or Kimi K2 (0711)? The short answer
Pick Qwen3.5-27B: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 22.9 against 12.7) and costs less.
- Qwen3.5-27B is cheaper: $0.74 against $1.00 per million tokens, 26% less.
- Qwen3.5-27B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 22.9 against 12.7.
- Qwen3.5-27B is newer: released 24 Feb 2026, against 12 Jul 2025 for Kimi K2 (0711).
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.5-27B does better for reasoning and knowledge; Kimi K2 (0711) for writing.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3.5-27B | Kimi K2 (0711) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.27 in · $2.16 out | $0.57 in · $2.30 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.74 | $1.00 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.54 (Alibaba) | – |
| Intelligence Index | 22.9 | 12.7 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | – |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Released | 24 Feb 2026 (newer) | 12 Jul 2025 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | China | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3.5-27B | Kimi K2 (0711) |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 129 · 114 of 387 measured | 1,409 | 1,418 |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 128 · 127 of 380 measured | 1,408 | 1,409 |
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 145 · 131 of 385 measured | 1,358 | 1,371 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 86 · 147 of 243 measured | 22.9 | 12.7 |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 74 · 131 of 231 measured | 85.8% | 76.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 95 · 168 of 242 measured | 23.9% | 7.4% |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 99 · 71 of 230 measured | 42.4think-prefill reasoning | 52.5 |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 49 · 129 of 230 measured | 11.0%think-prefill reasoning | 22.0% |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 147 · 217 of 230 measured | 0.33no reasoning | 0.29 |
Show all 16 results (7 more)
| Measure | Qwen3.5-27B | Kimi K2 (0711) |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 112 · 141 of 338 measured | 1,441 | 1,416 |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 122 · 151 of 387 measured | 1,401 | 1,381 |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 135 · 141 of 386 measured | 1,380 | 1,375 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results | ||
| IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 24 · 127 of 195 measured | 75.6% | 41.5% |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 63 · 146 of 233 measured | 77.7% | 53.0% |
| Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 61 · 107 of 190 measured | 32.6% | 15.9% |
| τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 28 · 95 of 193 measured | 93.9% | 61.1% |
Compare them with other models
Quick answers
Is Qwen3.5-27B better than Kimi K2 (0711)?
Pick Qwen3.5-27B: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 22.9 against 12.7) and costs less.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-27B or Kimi K2 (0711)?
Qwen3.5-27B is cheaper: $0.74 against $1.00 per million tokens, 26% less.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.5-27B or Kimi K2 (0711)?
Kimi K2 (0711) ranks 19 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 145 for Qwen3.5-27B.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.5-27B or Kimi K2 (0711)?
Qwen3.5-27B ranks 82 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 132 for Kimi K2 (0711).
Which is better for writing, Qwen3.5-27B or Kimi K2 (0711)?
Kimi K2 (0711) ranks 82 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 98 for Qwen3.5-27B.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-27B or Kimi K2 (0711)?
Qwen3.5-27B: 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Kimi K2 (0711).
Run Qwen3.5-27B and Kimi K2 (0711) on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.