Compare / Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 22 results on 4 sources that measured both models.
Of the 22 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 13 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-13-2e2420e3c5cc). See also Alibaba vs MiniMax, every model from both labs.
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or MiniMax-M2.7? The short answer
Pick MiniMax-M2.7: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 22.8 against 19.3) at about the same price.
- They cost about the same: $0.45 and $0.52 per million tokens (three input to one output).
- MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 22.8 against 19.3.
- MiniMax-M2.7 is newer: released 18 Mar 2026, against 24 Feb 2026 for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: MiniMax-M2.7 does better for agents and tool use and reasoning and knowledge.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.16 in · $1.30 out | $0.30 in · $1.20 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.45 | $0.52 |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.25 (Darkbloom, FP4) | $0.37 (GMICloud, FP8) |
| Cached input, per million | – | $0.060 cached input |
| Intelligence Index | 19.3 | 22.8 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | – |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 204,800 tokens |
| Released | 24 Feb 2026 | 18 Mar 2026 (newer) |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Developer based in | China | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 147 · 118 of 387 measured | 1,394 | 1,415 |
| Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 129 · 110 of 163 measured | 1,407 | 1,422 |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 139 · 101 of 380 measured | 1,403 | 1,424 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 108 · 87 of 243 measured | 19.3 | 22.8 |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 84 · 63 of 231 measured | 84.5% | 87.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 106 · 74 of 242 measured | 21.0% | 29.6% |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 97 · 120 of 230 measured | 42.6think-prefill reasoning | 37.6 |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 83 · 182 of 230 measured | 17.0%no reasoning | 36.0% |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 151 · 26 of 230 measured | 0.33no reasoning | 0.38 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard reported by Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · 2 results | ||
| Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better 62 · 84 of 104 measured | 10.5% | 12.9% |
| Answer rate · Vectara% of documents, higher is better 31 · 55 of 104 measured | 99.8% | 99.4% |
Show all 22 results (11 more)
| Measure | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results | ||
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 163 · 139 of 385 measured | 1,342 | 1,364 |
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 134 · 93 of 338 measured | 1,419 | 1,453 |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 140 · 114 of 387 measured | 1,386 | 1,407 |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 155 · 127 of 386 measured | 1,363 | 1,387 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 7 results | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better 72 · 54 of 130 measured | 40.8%no reasoning | 55.4% |
| τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better 107 · 77 of 121 measured | 4.9%no reasoning | 9.9% |
| Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score, higher is better 79 · 54 of 131 measured | 37.0no reasoning | 52.6 |
| IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 39 · 22 of 195 measured | 72.5% | 75.7% |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 99 · 54 of 233 measured | 72.0% | 78.3% |
| Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 74 · 36 of 190 measured | 26.5% | 39.4% |
| τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 45 · 60 of 193 measured | 89.2% | 84.8% |
Compare them with other models
Quick answers
Is Qwen3.5-35B-A3B better than MiniMax-M2.7?
Pick MiniMax-M2.7: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 22.8 against 19.3) at about the same price.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or MiniMax-M2.7?
They cost about the same: $0.45 and $0.52 per million tokens (three input to one output).
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 ranks 103 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 116 for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 ranks 72 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 92 for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.
Which is better for writing, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or MiniMax-M2.7?
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B ranks 108 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 109 for MiniMax-M2.7.
Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or MiniMax-M2.7?
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B ranks 112 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 126 for MiniMax-M2.7.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or MiniMax-M2.7?
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B: 262,144 tokens, against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.7.
Run Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and MiniMax-M2.7 on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.