Compare / Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 22 results on 4 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3.5-35B-A3B Released 24 Feb 2026 · $0.16 in · $1.30 out
NVIDIANemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Released 15 Dec 2025 · $0.050 in · $0.20 out
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B wins 20Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins 2

Of the 22 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5).

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B? The short answer

Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 19.3 against 8.9). Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B if cost matters more: it costs 5.1 times less per token.

  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper: $0.088 against $0.45 per million tokens, 5.1 times less.
  • Qwen3.5-35B-A3B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 19.3 against 8.9.
  • Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is newer: released 24 Feb 2026, against 15 Dec 2025 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B does better for reasoning and knowledge and writing.

Head to head

19.3
Intelligence Index
8.9
$0.45
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$0.088
262,144
Context window, tokens
262,144

Every fact side by side

Qwen3.5-35B-A3BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Price per million tokens$0.16 in · $1.30 out$0.050 in · $0.20 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.45$0.088
Cheapest host, blended$0.25 (Darkbloom, FP4)$0.088 (DeepInfra, FP4)
Intelligence Index19.38.9
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second–223
Context window262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Released24 Feb 2026 (newer)15 Dec 2025
WeightsOpenOpen
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 116 of 164 148 of 164
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 92 of 198 133 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 108 of 188 170 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 112 of 152 120 of 152

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3.5-35B-A3BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 147 · 242 of 387 measured 1,394 1,314
Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 129 · 155 of 163 measured 1,407 1,362
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 139 · 223 of 380 measured 1,403 1,317
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 108 · 185 of 243 measured 19.3 8.9thinking reasoning
GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 84 · 135 of 231 measured 84.5% 75.7%thinking reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 106 · 143 of 242 measured 21.0% 11.4%thinking reasoning
UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results
Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 97 · 173 of 230 measured 42.6think-prefill reasoning 25.9
Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 83 · 180 of 230 measured 17.0%no reasoning 35.0%
Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 151 · 221 of 230 measured 0.33no reasoning 0.28
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard reported by Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · 2 results
Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better 62 · 55 of 104 measured 10.5% 9.6%
Answer rate · Vectara% of documents, higher is better 31 · 45 of 104 measured 99.8% 99.6%
Show all 22 results (11 more)
MeasureQwen3.5-35B-A3BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 163 · 273 of 385 measured 1,342 1,242
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 134 · 208 of 338 measured 1,419 1,331
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 140 · 247 of 387 measured 1,386 1,291
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 155 · 270 of 386 measured 1,363 1,267
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 7 results
Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better 72 · 107 of 130 measured 40.8%no reasoning 6.7%thinking reasoning
τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better 107 · 97 of 121 measured 4.9%no reasoning 6.0%thinking reasoning
Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score, higher is better 79 · 113 of 131 measured 37.0no reasoning 14.4thinking reasoning
IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 39 · 49 of 195 measured 72.5% 71.1%thinking reasoning
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 99 · 172 of 233 measured 72.0% 38.0%thinking reasoning
Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 74 · 116 of 190 measured 26.5% 13.6%thinking reasoning
τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 45 · 115 of 193 measured 89.2% 40.9%thinking reasoning

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.5-35B-A3B better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 19.3 against 8.9). Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B if cost matters more: it costs 5.1 times less per token.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper: $0.088 against $0.45 per million tokens, 5.1 times less.

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B ranks 116 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 148 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B ranks 92 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 133 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B ranks 108 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 170 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B ranks 112 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 120 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.

Run Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.