Compare / Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning)
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B vs Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning)
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 12 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Of the 12 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs xAI, every model from both labs.
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning)? The short answer
Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 19.3 against 11.3) at about the same price.
- Qwen3.5-35B-A3B scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 19.3 against 11.3.
- Qwen3.5-35B-A3B is newer: released 24 Feb 2026, against 19 Nov 2025 for Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning).
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B does better for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.16 in · $1.30 out | Not on sale |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.45 | – |
| Cheapest host, blended | $0.25 (Darkbloom, FP4) | – |
| Intelligence Index | 19.3 | 11.3 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | – |
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | – |
| Released | 24 Feb 2026 (newer) | 19 Nov 2025 |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Developer based in | China | the US |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 108 · 159 of 243 measured | 19.3 | 11.3no reasoning |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 84 · 174 of 231 measured | 84.5% | 63.7%no reasoning |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 106 · 189 of 242 measured | 21.0% | 5.1%no reasoning |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 97 · 101 of 230 measured | 42.6think-prefill reasoning | 41.9 |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 83 · 43 of 230 measured | 17.0%no reasoning | 10.0% |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 151 · 178 of 230 measured | 0.33no reasoning | 0.32 |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard reported by Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · 2 results | ||
| Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better 62 · 93 of 104 measured | 10.5% | 17.8% |
| Answer rate · Vectara% of documents, higher is better 31 · 74 of 104 measured | 99.8% | 98.5% |
Show all 12 results (4 more)
| Measure | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning) |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results | ||
| IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 39 · 153 of 195 measured | 72.5% | 36.5%no reasoning |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 99 · 185 of 233 measured | 72.0% | 31.3%no reasoning |
| Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 74 · 114 of 190 measured | 26.5% | 14.4%no reasoning |
| τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 45 · 91 of 193 measured | 89.2% | 63.7%no reasoning |
Compare them with other models
Quick answers
Is Qwen3.5-35B-A3B better than Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning)?
Pick Qwen3.5-35B-A3B: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 19.3 against 11.3) at about the same price.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning)?
Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning) ranks 21 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 116 for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning)?
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B ranks 92 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 148 for Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning).
Which is better for writing, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning)?
Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning) ranks 102 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 108 for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B.
Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B or Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning)?
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B ranks 112 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 141 for Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning).
Run Qwen3.5-35B-A3B and Grok 4.1 Fast (non-reasoning) on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.