Compare / Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Muse Spark 1.2

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Muse Spark 1.2

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Alibaba · profile
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.5 397B A17BMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 24.9%36.4%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4451,484
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4451,519
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4051,448
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4761,502
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4341,475
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4421,496
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4211,472
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 48.272.2
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 21.439.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.3%90.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 29.0%45.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.3%79.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 44.8%57.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 51.3%80.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%7.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 13.4%34.8%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.