Compare / Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs gpt-oss-20b

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs gpt-oss-20b

21 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Alibaba · profile
gpt-oss-20b
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
21
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.5 397B A17Bgpt-oss-20b
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4451,323
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4051,240
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4761,314
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4341,281
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4421,318
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4211,275
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 48.220.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 21.410.0
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.3%68.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 29.0%11.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 78.8%65.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.3%34.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 44.8%38.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 51.3%13.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%0.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 40.9%10.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 13.4%7.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 95.6%60.2%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 23.0%98.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.330.31
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 50.124.6

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.