Compare / Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs GLM 5.3

Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs GLM 5.3

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Alibaba · profile
GLM 5.3
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.5 397B A17BGLM 5.3
APEX-AgentsreportedTasks passed% of tasks 24.9%56.6%
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4451,468
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4451,474
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4051,456
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4761,516
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4341,480
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4421,480
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4211,470
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 48.274.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 21.444.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 89.3%91.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 29.0%42.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 77.3%79.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 44.8%59.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 51.3%83.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 0.0%41.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 13.4%50.3%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.