Compare / Qwen3.5-Flash vs Claude Opus 4.7

Qwen3.5-Flash vs Claude Opus 4.7

15 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.5-Flash
Alibaba · profile
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
15
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.5-FlashClaude Opus 4.7
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4141,477
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4031,508
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,3381,488
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4201,535
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,3811,503
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,3961,502
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,3671,496
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 38.1%69.7%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 27.9%48.5%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 12.5%56.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 49.7%81.2%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 62.0%81.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 38.3%80.8%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedAnswer rate% of documents 99.8%98.0%
Vectara Hallucination LeaderboardreportedHallucination rate% of summaries 10.5%12.0%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.