Compare / Qwen3.5-Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

Qwen3.5-Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.5

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 17 results on 5 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3.5-Flash $0.065 in · $0.26 out
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.5 Released 29 Sep 2025 · $3.00 in · $15.00 out
Qwen3.5-Flash wins 21 too close to callClaude Sonnet 4.5 wins 14

Of the 17 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 14 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-14-7d7cf32c3f6d). See also Alibaba vs Anthropic, every model from both labs.

Qwen3.5-Flash or Claude Sonnet 4.5? The short answer

They score about the same, so pick Qwen3.5-Flash: it costs 53 times less per token.

  • Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper: $0.11 against $6.00 per million tokens, 53 times less.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Claude Sonnet 4.5 does better for agents and tool use, writing and sticking to the facts.

Head to head

$0.11
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$6.00
1,000,000
Context window, tokens
1,000,000

Every fact side by side

Qwen3.5-FlashClaude Sonnet 4.5
Price per million tokens$0.065 in · $0.26 out$3.00 in · $15.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.11$6.00
Cheapest host, blended–$6.00 (Amazon Bedrock)
Intelligence Index–20.7
Spring Prompt overall––
Output speed, tokens a second––
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Released–29 Sep 2025
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 145 of 166 102 of 166
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 40 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge not measured 100 of 200
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 117 of 189 35 of 189
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 120 of 153 102 of 153

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3.5-FlashClaude Sonnet 4.5
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 142 · 56 of 387 measured 1,396 1,457high-32k reasoning
Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 123 · 61 of 163 measured 1,414 1,449
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 137 · 51 of 380 measured 1,403 1,461
OpenHands Index reported by OpenHands Index · 3 results
Average% resolved, higher is better 30 · 15 of 34 measured 38.1%openhands 53.0%openhands
Front end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved, higher is better 24 · 11 of 34 measured 27.9%openhands 36.8%openhands
Greenfield (Commit0)% resolved, higher is better 25 · 25 of 34 measured 12.5%openhands 12.5%openhands
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) reported by SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · 1 result
Correct answers% of questions, higher is better 64 · 58 of 76 measured 20.3% 30.7%thinking-59k reasoning
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard reported by Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · 2 results
Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better 62 · 77 of 104 measured 10.5% 12.0%
Answer rate · Vectara% of documents, higher is better 31 · 86 of 104 measured 99.8% 95.6%
Vending-Bench 2 reported by Vending-Bench 2 · 1 result
Money after a yearUS dollars, higher is better 48 · 34 of 58 measured $462.69 $3,839
Show all 17 results (7 more)
MeasureQwen3.5-FlashClaude Sonnet 4.5
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 167 · 27 of 385 measured 1,337 1,454
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 135 · 43 of 338 measured 1,419 1,498high-32k reasoning
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 148 · 38 of 387 measured 1,381 1,464high-32k reasoning
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 149 · 38 of 386 measured 1,367 1,454
OpenHands Index reported by OpenHands Index · 3 results
Information gathering (GAIA)% resolved, higher is better 23 · 10 of 34 measured 49.7%openhands 72.7%openhands
Issue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved, higher is better 31 · 17 of 34 measured 62.0%openhands 74.2%openhands
Testing (SWT-Bench)% resolved, higher is better 31 · 16 of 34 measured 38.3%openhands 68.8%openhands

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.5-Flash better than Claude Sonnet 4.5?

They score about the same, so pick Qwen3.5-Flash: it costs 53 times less per token.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-Flash or Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper: $0.11 against $6.00 per million tokens, 53 times less.

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.5-Flash or Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 ranks 102 of 166 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 145 for Qwen3.5-Flash.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3.5-Flash or Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 ranks 35 of 189 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 117 for Qwen3.5-Flash.

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.5-Flash or Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 ranks 102 of 153 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 120 for Qwen3.5-Flash.

Run Qwen3.5-Flash and Claude Sonnet 4.5 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.