Compare / Qwen3.5-Flash vs GPT-4.1
Qwen3.5-Flash vs GPT-4.1
10 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3.5-Flash | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,414 | 1,408 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,403 | 1,415 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,338 | 1,402 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,420 | 1,405 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,381 | 1,403 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,396 | 1,415 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,367 | 1,405 |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 20.3% | 31.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.8% | 99.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 10.5% | 5.6% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.