Compare / Qwen3.5-Flash vs GPT-5 Nano
Qwen3.5-Flash vs GPT-5 Nano
9 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3.5-Flash | GPT-5 Nano |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,403 | 1,339 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,338 | 1,247 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,420 | 1,354 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,381 | 1,327 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,396 | 1,338 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,367 | 1,289 |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 20.3% | 11.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Answer rate% of documents | 99.8% | 100.0% |
| Vectara Hallucination Leaderboardreported | Hallucination rate% of summaries | 10.5% | 10.5% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.