Compare / Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 4 results on 3 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) Released 16 Feb 2026 · $0.26 in · $1.56 out
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5 Released 15 Oct 2025 · $1.00 in · $5.00 out
Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) wins 2Claude Haiku 4.5 wins 2

Of the 4 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs Anthropic, every model from both labs.

Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) or Claude Haiku 4.5? The short answer

They score about the same, so pick Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15): it costs 3.4 times less per token.

  • Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) is cheaper: $0.58 against $2.00 per million tokens, 3.4 times less.
  • Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) is newer: released 16 Feb 2026, against 15 Oct 2025 for Claude Haiku 4.5.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Claude Haiku 4.5 does better for agents and tool use.

Head to head

$0.58
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$2.00
1,000,000
Context window, tokens
200,000

Every fact side by side

Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15)Claude Haiku 4.5
Price per million tokens$0.26 in · $1.56 out$1.00 in · $5.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$0.58$2.00
Cheapest host, blended–$2.00 (Amazon Bedrock)
Cached input, per million–$0.10 cached input
Intelligence Index–16.9
Spring Prompt overall–7
Output speed, tokens a second–97
Context window1,000,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Released16 Feb 2026 (newer)15 Oct 2025
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Product listingsTurning a sparse product feed and photos into listings that can go live not measured 19 of 20
Decks from an analysisTurning a finished analysis into a deck you could present as it is not measured 15 of 19
User surveysPlanning a user survey and reading its results without being misled not measured 8 of 8
Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending not measured 18 of 19
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 160 of 164 91 of 164
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge not measured 127 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality not measured 87 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 115 of 152 117 of 152
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) not measured 17 of 23

From our research

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15)Claude Haiku 4.5
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) reported by SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · 1 result
Correct answers% of questions, higher is better 62 · 69 of 76 measured 25.4% 13.2%
Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard reported by Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard · 2 results
Hallucination rate · Vectara% of summaries, lower is better 67 · 58 of 104 measured 10.7% 9.8%
Answer rate · Vectara% of documents, higher is better 31 · 50 of 104 measured 99.8% 99.5%
Vending-Bench 2 reported by Vending-Bench 2 · 1 result
Money after a yearUS dollars, higher is better 54 · 49 of 58 measured $0.54 $458.89

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) better than Claude Haiku 4.5?

They score about the same, so pick Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15): it costs 3.4 times less per token.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) or Claude Haiku 4.5?

Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) is cheaper: $0.58 against $2.00 per million tokens, 3.4 times less.

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) or Claude Haiku 4.5?

Claude Haiku 4.5 ranks 91 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 160 for Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15).

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) or Claude Haiku 4.5?

Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) ranks 115 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 117 for Claude Haiku 4.5.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) or Claude Haiku 4.5?

Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15): 1,000,000 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5.

Run Qwen3.5-Plus (2026-02-15) and Claude Haiku 4.5 on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.