Compare / Qwen3.6-Max-Preview vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Qwen3.6-Max-Preview vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 4 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3.6-Max-Preview Released 20 Apr 2026 · $1.03 in · $6.16 out
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro Preview Released 19 Feb 2026 · $2.00 in · $12.00 out
Qwen3.6-Max-Preview wins 21 too close to callGemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins 13

Of the 16 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs Google, every model from both labs.

Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview? The short answer

They score about the same, so pick Qwen3.6-Max-Preview: it costs 49% less per token.

  • Qwen3.6-Max-Preview is cheaper: $2.31 against $4.50 per million tokens, 49% less.
  • Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 29.7 against 28.4.
  • Qwen3.6-Max-Preview is newer: released 20 Apr 2026, against 19 Feb 2026 for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.6-Max-Preview does better for agents and tool use; Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for reasoning and knowledge, writing and sticking to the facts.

Head to head

28.4
Intelligence Index
29.7
$2.31
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$4.50
262,144
Context window, tokens
1,048,576

Every fact side by side

Qwen3.6-Max-PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Price per million tokens$1.03 in · $6.16 out$2.00 in · $12.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$2.31$4.50
Cheapest host, blended–$4.50 (Google)
Cached input, per million–$0.20 cached input
Intelligence Index28.429.7
Spring Prompt overall–49
Output speed, tokens a second–120
Context window262,144 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Released20 Apr 2026 (newer)19 Feb 2026
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Product listingsTurning a sparse product feed and photos into listings that can go live not measured 8 of 20
Decks from an analysisTurning a finished analysis into a deck you could present as it is not measured 13 of 19
User surveysPlanning a user survey and reading its results without being misled not measured 5 of 8
Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending not measured 9 of 19
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 81 of 164 61 of 164
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects not measured 36 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 59 of 198 24 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 41 of 188 9 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 45 of 152 34 of 152
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) not measured 5 of 23

From our research

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3.6-Max-PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 51 · 15 of 387 measured 1,460 1,487
Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 51 · 21 of 163 measured 1,453 1,472
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 64 · 23 of 380 measured 1,451 1,477
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 57 · 52 of 243 measured 28.4 29.7
GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 55 · 5 of 231 measured 88.8% 94.1%
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 70 · 16 of 242 measured 30.8% 47.0%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) reported by SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · 1 result
Correct answers% of questions, higher is better 21 · 3 of 76 measured 52.0% 73.5%high reasoning
Vending-Bench 2 reported by Vending-Bench 2 · 1 result
Money after a yearUS dollars, higher is better 31 · 45 of 58 measured $4,254 $911.21
Show all 16 results (8 more)
MeasureQwen3.6-Max-PreviewGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 50 · 10 of 385 measured 1,437 1,480
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 36 · 26 of 338 measured 1,500 1,509
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 56 · 17 of 387 measured 1,450 1,480
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 50 · 11 of 386 measured 1,446 1,480
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results
IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 14 · 13 of 195 measured 76.6% 77.1%
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 33 · 24 of 233 measured 80.7% 82.0%
Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 23 · 8 of 190 measured 43.9% 53.8%
τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 12 · 16 of 193 measured 95.9% 95.6%

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.6-Max-Preview better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

They score about the same, so pick Qwen3.6-Max-Preview: it costs 49% less per token.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Qwen3.6-Max-Preview is cheaper: $2.31 against $4.50 per million tokens, 49% less.

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks 61 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 81 for Qwen3.6-Max-Preview.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks 24 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 59 for Qwen3.6-Max-Preview.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks 9 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 41 for Qwen3.6-Max-Preview.

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ranks 34 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 45 for Qwen3.6-Max-Preview.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.6-Max-Preview or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 1,048,576 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3.6-Max-Preview.

Run Qwen3.6-Max-Preview and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.

Try the playgroundTalk to us