Compare / Qwen3.6-Plus vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Qwen3.6-Plus vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 19 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Of the 19 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5).
Qwen3.6-Plus or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking? The short answer
Pick Qwen3.6-Plus if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 27.0 against 11.2). Pick Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking if cost matters more: it costs 44% less per token.
- Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is cheaper: $0.41 against $0.73 per million tokens, 44% less.
- Qwen3.6-Plus scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 27.0 against 11.2.
- Qwen3.6-Plus is newer: released 31 Mar 2026, against 11 Sep 2025 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.6-Plus does better for agents and tool use, reasoning and knowledge and writing.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3.6-Plus | Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.33 in · $1.95 out | $0.15 in · $1.20 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.73 | $0.41 |
| Cheapest host, blended | – | $0.41 (Alibaba) |
| Intelligence Index | 27.0 | 11.2 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | 178 |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Released | 31 Mar 2026 (newer) | 11 Sep 2025 |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Developer based in | China | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3.6-Plus | Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 76 · 170 of 387 measured | 1,443 | 1,369 |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 75 · 173 of 380 measured | 1,446 | 1,367 |
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 82 · 180 of 385 measured | 1,407 | 1,326 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 62 · 161 of 243 measured | 27.0 | 11.2 |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 58 · 134 of 231 measured | 88.2% | 75.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 84 · 136 of 242 measured | 27.8% | 12.6% |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 49 · 167 of 230 measured | 58.2thinking reasoning | 27.2 |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 25 · 211 of 230 measured | 8.0%thinking reasoning | 67.0% |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 96 · 220 of 230 measured | 0.35no reasoning | 0.29 |
Show all 19 results (10 more)
| Measure | Qwen3.6-Plus | Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 68 · 165 of 338 measured | 1,476 | 1,393 |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 74 · 171 of 387 measured | 1,435 | 1,359 |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 76 · 177 of 386 measured | 1,423 | 1,341 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 7 results | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better 47 · 107 of 130 measured | 61.4% | 6.7% |
| τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better 48 · 95 of 121 measured | 20.8% | 6.2% |
| Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score, higher is better 50 · 106 of 131 measured | 54.5 | 17.4 |
| IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 29 · 79 of 195 measured | 75.2% | 60.7% |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 54 · 131 of 233 measured | 78.3% | 63.7% |
| Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 23 · 129 of 190 measured | 43.9% | 9.8% |
| τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 7 · 113 of 193 measured | 97.7% | 41.5% |
Quick answers
Is Qwen3.6-Plus better than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?
Pick Qwen3.6-Plus if quality matters most: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 27.0 against 11.2). Pick Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking if cost matters more: it costs 44% less per token.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6-Plus or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is cheaper: $0.41 against $0.73 per million tokens, 44% less.
Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.6-Plus or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?
Qwen3.6-Plus ranks 63 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 140 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.6-Plus or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?
Qwen3.6-Plus ranks 67 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 126 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.
Which is better for writing, Qwen3.6-Plus or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?
Qwen3.6-Plus ranks 54 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 143 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.
Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.6-Plus or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ranks 64 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 80 for Qwen3.6-Plus.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.6-Plus or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?
Qwen3.6-Plus: 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.
Run Qwen3.6-Plus and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.