Compare / Qwen3.6 Plus vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Qwen3.6 Plus vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

18 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba · profile
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.6 PlusDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4461,423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4071,405
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4361,420
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4431,417
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4231,411
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 54.543.5
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 27.014.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 88.2%79.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 27.8%16.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 75.2%57.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 78.3%69.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 61.4%44.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 43.9%31.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 20.8%21.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 97.7%37.1%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 8.0%32.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.37
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 58.254.0

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.