Compare / Qwen3.6 Plus vs DeepSeek V3.2

Qwen3.6 Plus vs DeepSeek V3.2

16 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.6 Plus
Alibaba · profile
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek · profile
Results compared
16
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.6 PlusDeepSeek V3.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4381,437
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4461,423
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4071,400
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,4761,453
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4361,420
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4431,425
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4231,410
OpenHands IndexreportedAverage% resolved 52.9%45.7%
OpenHands IndexreportedFront end (SWE-Bench Multimodal)% resolved 30.9%27.9%
OpenHands IndexreportedGreenfield (Commit0)% resolved 25.0%25.0%
OpenHands IndexreportedInformation gathering (GAIA)% resolved 72.1%50.3%
OpenHands IndexreportedIssue resolution (SWE-Bench)% resolved 74.2%71.6%
OpenHands IndexreportedTesting (SWT-Bench)% resolved 62.1%53.6%
UGI LeaderboardreportedRequested-length error% off the requested word count 8.0%26.0%
UGI LeaderboardreportedStyle adherencescore from 0 to 1 0.350.36
UGI LeaderboardreportedWriting scorescore out of 100 58.257.3

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.