Compare / Qwen3.6 Plus vs GPT-5.4 Nano
Qwen3.6 Plus vs GPT-5.4 Nano
18 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3.6 Plus | GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,438 | 1,418 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Business, management and financeArena rating | 1,446 | 1,405 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Creative writingArena rating | 1,407 | 1,335 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Expert promptsArena rating | 1,476 | 1,438 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Instruction followingArena rating | 1,436 | 1,387 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | OverallArena rating | 1,443 | 1,401 |
| Arena (formerly LMArena)reported | Writing, literature and languageArena rating | 1,423 | 1,362 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score | 54.5 | 56.1 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score | 27.0 | 20.7 |
| Artificial Analysisreported | GPQA Diamond% of questions | 88.2% | 81.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Humanity's Last Exam% of questions | 27.8% | 28.3% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | IFBench% of instructions | 75.2% | 75.9% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions | 78.3% | 76.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks | 61.4% | 60.7% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks | 43.9% | 42.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ-bench banking% of tasks | 20.8% | 27.4% |
| Artificial Analysisreported | Τ²-bench telecom% of tasks | 97.7% | 76.0% |
| SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reported | Correct answers% of questions | 44.1% | 11.7% |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.