Compare / Qwen3.6-Plus vs GLM-4.5
Qwen3.6-Plus vs GLM-4.5
Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 16 results on 3 sources that measured both models.
Of the 16 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.
Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs Z.ai, every model from both labs.
Qwen3.6-Plus or GLM-4.5? The short answer
Pick Qwen3.6-Plus: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 27.0 against 12.8) and costs less.
- Qwen3.6-Plus is cheaper: $0.73 against $1.00 per million tokens, 27% less.
- Qwen3.6-Plus scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 27.0 against 12.8.
- Qwen3.6-Plus is newer: released 31 Mar 2026, against 3 Aug 2025 for GLM-4.5.
- On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.6-Plus does better for reasoning and knowledge and writing.
Head to head
Every fact side by side
| Qwen3.6-Plus | GLM-4.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price per million tokens | $0.33 in · $1.95 out | $0.60 in · $2.20 out |
| Blended (3 in : 1 out) | $0.73 | $1.00 |
| Cheapest host, blended | – | – |
| Intelligence Index | 27.0 | 12.8 |
| Spring Prompt overall | – | – |
| Output speed, tokens a second | – | – |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Released | 31 Mar 2026 (newer) | 3 Aug 2025 |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Developer based in | China | China |
Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.
Which is better for what
Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.
Every shared result
Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.
| Measure | Qwen3.6-Plus | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 76 · 125 of 387 measured | 1,443 | 1,411 |
| Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 75 · 121 of 380 measured | 1,446 | 1,412 |
| Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 82 · 130 of 385 measured | 1,407 | 1,372 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results | ||
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 62 · 145 of 243 measured | 27.0 | 12.8 |
| GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 58 · 118 of 231 measured | 88.2% | 78.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 84 · 134 of 242 measured | 27.8% | 13.0% |
| UGI Leaderboard reported by UGI Leaderboard · 3 results | ||
| Writing score · UGIscore out of 100, higher is better 49 · 53 of 230 measured | 58.2thinking reasoning | 57.3thinking reasoning |
| Requested-length error · UGI% off the requested word count, lower is better 25 · 57 of 230 measured | 8.0%thinking reasoning | 13.0%no reasoning |
| Style adherence · UGIscore from 0 to 1, higher is better 96 · 73 of 230 measured | 0.35no reasoning | 0.36thinking reasoning |
Show all 16 results (7 more)
| Measure | Qwen3.6-Plus | GLM-4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results | ||
| Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 68 · 107 of 338 measured | 1,476 | 1,444 |
| Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 74 · 117 of 387 measured | 1,435 | 1,405 |
| Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 76 · 132 of 386 measured | 1,423 | 1,382 |
| Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 4 results | ||
| IFBench% of instructions, higher is better 29 · 119 of 195 measured | 75.2% | 44.1% |
| Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 54 · 150 of 233 measured | 78.3% | 52.7% |
| Terminal-Bench Hard% of tasks, higher is better 23 · 87 of 190 measured | 43.9% | 22.0% |
| τ²-bench telecom% of tasks, higher is better 7 · 112 of 193 measured | 97.7% | 43.0% |
Compare them with other models
Quick answers
Is Qwen3.6-Plus better than GLM-4.5?
Pick Qwen3.6-Plus: it scores higher (Intelligence Index 27.0 against 12.8) and costs less.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6-Plus or GLM-4.5?
Qwen3.6-Plus is cheaper: $0.73 against $1.00 per million tokens, 27% less.
Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.6-Plus or GLM-4.5?
Qwen3.6-Plus ranks 67 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 120 for GLM-4.5.
Which is better for writing, Qwen3.6-Plus or GLM-4.5?
Qwen3.6-Plus ranks 54 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 76 for GLM-4.5.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.6-Plus or GLM-4.5?
Qwen3.6-Plus: 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for GLM-4.5.
Run Qwen3.6-Plus and GLM-4.5 on your own prompt
Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.