Compare / Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Opus 4.7

Qwen3.7 Max vs Claude Opus 4.7

11 results from 2 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba · profile
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
11
Shared sources
2
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.7 MaxClaude Opus 4.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 66.073.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 29.540.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.3%91.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 40.5%42.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 80.5%58.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 79.0%78.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 74.5%83.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 50.8%54.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 11.8%34.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 94.7%88.6%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 55.8%51.7%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.