Compare / Qwen3.7 Max vs Muse Spark 1.1

Qwen3.7 Max vs Muse Spark 1.1

14 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba · profile
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta · profile
Results compared
14
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.7 MaxMuse Spark 1.1
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate -0.09-0.02
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate -0.08-0.11
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate -0.03-0.06
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate -0.000.00
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 66.071.3
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 29.533.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.3%89.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 40.5%46.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 79.0%77.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 49.5%58.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 74.5%77.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 1.5%6.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 11.8%31.8%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 55.8%57.8%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.