Compare / Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 Terra

Qwen3.7 Max vs GPT-5.6 Terra

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba · profile
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.7 MaxGPT-5.6 Terra
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate -0.09-0.06
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate -0.080.03
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate -0.030.04
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate -0.000.00
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 66.076.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 29.542.1
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.3%92.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 40.5%42.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 80.5%71.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 79.0%83.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 49.5%55.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 74.5%88.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 1.5%35.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 50.8%62.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 11.8%40.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 94.7%86.3%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 55.8%43.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.