Compare / Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM 5.2

Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM 5.2

17 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba · profile
GLM 5.2
Z.ai · profile
Results compared
17
Shared sources
3
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.7 MaxGLM 5.2
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedConfirmed task successIPS effect estimate -0.090.04
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedPraise over complaintIPS effect estimate -0.080.10
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedSteerabilityIPS effect estimate -0.030.04
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedTool groundingIPS effect estimate -0.000.00
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 66.068.8
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 29.533.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.3%89.5%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 40.5%41.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedIFBench% of instructions 80.5%73.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 79.0%78.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedSciCode% of problems 49.5%51.2%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 74.5%77.9%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks 1.5%1.0%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench Hard% of tasks 50.8%50.8%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 11.8%34.6%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ²-bench telecom% of tasks 94.7%99.1%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 55.8%34.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.