Compare / Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 4.7

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Claude Opus 4.7

18 results from 5 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Alibaba · profile
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · profile
Results compared
18
Shared sources
5
BenchmarkMetricQwen3.8 Max (0902)Claude Opus 4.7
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4711,477
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedBusiness, management and financeArena rating 1,4801,508
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedCreative writingArena rating 1,4671,488
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedExpert promptsArena rating 1,5101,535
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedInstruction followingArena rating 1,4721,503
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedOverallArena rating 1,4791,502
Arena (formerly LMArena)reportedWriting, literature and languageArena rating 1,4721,496
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score 76.273.6
Artificial AnalysisreportedArtificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score 45.440.7
Artificial AnalysisreportedGPQA Diamond% of questions 92.8%91.4%
Artificial AnalysisreportedHumanity's Last Exam% of questions 43.1%42.3%
Artificial AnalysisreportedLong-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions 80.3%78.7%
Artificial AnalysisreportedTerminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks 88.8%83.1%
Artificial AnalysisreportedΤ-bench banking% of tasks 47.8%34.6%
GDP.pdfreportedProfessional document tasks% of rubric 23.2%21.0%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI)reportedCorrect answers% of questions 47.3%51.7%
tau2-benchreportedConsistency (pass^4)% of tasks 35.1%24.7%
tau2-benchreportedTask success (pass^1)% of tasks 55.2%40.2%

Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.