Compare / Qwen3.8-Max (0902) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Qwen3.8-Max (0902) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash

Which is cheaper, which is more capable, and which does better at each kind of work, from 18 results on 4 sources that measured both models.

AlibabaQwen3.8-Max (0902) Released 3 Aug 2026 · $2.00 in · $6.00 out
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash Released 19 May 2026 · $1.50 in · $9.00 out
Qwen3.8-Max (0902) wins 106 too close to callGemini 3.5 Flash wins 2

Of the 18 results both models have, the better value on each. Results whose reported ranges overlap are too close to call.

Results as of 9 October 2026 (catalogue release 2026-10-09-dd620e778ac5). See also Alibaba vs Google, every model from both labs.

Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or Gemini 3.5 Flash? The short answer

Pick Qwen3.8-Max (0902): it scores higher (Intelligence Index 45.4 against 33.6) at about the same price.

  • They cost about the same: $3.00 and $3.38 per million tokens (three input to one output).
  • Qwen3.8-Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index: 45.4 against 33.6.
  • Qwen3.8-Max (0902) is newer: released 3 Aug 2026, against 19 May 2026 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.
  • On third-party benchmarks, on the results both models have: Qwen3.8-Max (0902) does better for agents and tool use, professional work and reasoning and knowledge; Gemini 3.5 Flash for sticking to the facts.

Head to head

45.4
Intelligence Index
33.6
$3.00
Price per million tokens, blendedlower is better
$3.38
1,000,000
Context window, tokens
1,048,576

Every fact side by side

Qwen3.8-Max (0902)Gemini 3.5 Flash
Price per million tokens$2.00 in · $6.00 out$1.50 in · $9.00 out
Blended (3 in : 1 out)$3.00$3.38
Cheapest host, blended–$3.38 (Google)
Cached input, per million–$0.15 cached input
Intelligence Index45.433.6
Spring Prompt overall48–
Output speed, tokens a second37–
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Released3 Aug 2026 (newer)19 May 2026
WeightsClosedClosed
Developer based inChinathe US

Prices are the developer's list price where we have read it, otherwise the typical host on OpenRouter; see every model's price. Intelligence and speed from Artificial Analysis.

Which is better for what

Each model's rank among the models on sale today, for each kind of work, from our own benchmarks and licensed sources. Further right is better; the better rank is in green.

Product listingsTurning a sparse product feed and photos into listings that can go live 17 of 20 not measured
Decks from an analysisTurning a finished analysis into a deck you could present as it is 11 of 19 not measured
Marketing planningPlanning a year of ad spend without overspending 14 of 19 not measured
Agents and tool useMulti-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls 7 of 164 44 of 164
Professional workReal tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects 18 of 51 42 of 51
Reasoning and knowledgeHard questions across science, maths and general knowledge 17 of 198 32 of 198
WritingWhat people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality 16 of 188 12 of 188
Sticking to the factsSummarising without inventing things, and factual answers 38 of 152 16 of 152
Speed under pressureGood decisions against a real clock (fast chess) 24 of 24 4 of 23

From our research

Every shared result

Each model's best result on every measure both have, grouped by benchmark, with the setting that produced it. Under each measure, every model that benchmark has measured is a grey tick, best to the right, so you can see where the two sit in the field. The headline measures of each benchmark come first; the rest are under "Show all". Green marks the better value; where a source reports ranges that overlap, neither is marked.

MeasureQwen3.8-Max (0902)Gemini 3.5 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 3 results
Overall · TextArena rating, higher is better 20 · 25 of 387 measured 1,482 1,477high reasoning
Overall · Text factualityArena rating, higher is better 22 · 17 of 163 measured 1,472 1,476high reasoning
Business, management and finance · TextArena rating, higher is better 16 · 35 of 380 measured 1,484 1,468high reasoning
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 3 results
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Indexindex score, higher is better 14 · 45 of 243 measured 45.4 33.6medium reasoning
GPQA Diamond% of questions, higher is better 15 · 23 of 231 measured 92.8% 92.2%high reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam% of questions, higher is better 24 · 28 of 242 measured 43.1% 42.7%high reasoning
GDP.pdf reported by GDP.pdf · 1 result
Professional document tasks% of rubric, higher is better 13 · 24 of 32 measured 23.2%xhigh reasoning 14.0%
SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) reported by SimpleQA Verified (Epoch AI) · 1 result
Correct answers% of questions, higher is better 30 · 11 of 76 measured 47.3%xhigh reasoning 66.2%high reasoning
Show all 18 results (10 more)
MeasureQwen3.8-Max (0902)Gemini 3.5 Flash
Arena (formerly LMArena) reported by Arena (formerly LMArena) · 4 results
Creative writing · TextArena rating, higher is better 17 · 15 of 385 measured 1,468 1,469medium reasoning
Expert prompts · TextArena rating, higher is better 20 · 49 of 338 measured 1,513 1,492high reasoning
Instruction following · TextArena rating, higher is better 25 · 35 of 387 measured 1,474 1,466medium reasoning
Writing, literature and language · TextArena rating, higher is better 18 · 15 of 386 measured 1,472 1,474high reasoning
Artificial Analysis reported by Artificial Analysis · 6 results
Terminal-Bench 2.1% of tasks, higher is better 5 · 26 of 130 measured 88.8% 78.7%high reasoning
Terminal-Bench 4.0% of tasks, higher is better 12 · 42 of 112 measured 38.9% 6.6%high reasoning
τ-bench banking% of tasks, higher is better 7 · 31 of 121 measured 47.8% 32.2%high reasoning
Artificial Analysis Coding Indexindex score, higher is better 10 · 27 of 131 measured 76.2 70.1high reasoning
Long-context reasoning (AA-LCR)% of questions, higher is better 35 · 82 of 233 measured 80.3% 74.3%medium reasoning
SciCode% of problems, higher is better 36 · 31 of 113 measured 52.1% 53.9%high reasoning

Quick answers

Is Qwen3.8-Max (0902) better than Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Pick Qwen3.8-Max (0902): it scores higher (Intelligence Index 45.4 against 33.6) at about the same price.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

They cost about the same: $3.00 and $3.38 per million tokens (three input to one output).

Which is better for agents and tool use, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Qwen3.8-Max (0902) ranks 7 of 164 models on sale for multi-step tasks with tools: support desks, coding agents, function calls, against 44 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Which is better for professional work, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Qwen3.8-Max (0902) ranks 18 of 51 models on sale for real tasks from banking, consulting and law, business documents and freelance projects, against 42 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Which is better for reasoning and knowledge, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Qwen3.8-Max (0902) ranks 17 of 198 models on sale for hard questions across science, maths and general knowledge, against 32 for Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Which is better for writing, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks 12 of 188 models on sale for what people prefer in blind comparisons, and judged writing quality, against 16 for Qwen3.8-Max (0902).

Which is better for sticking to the facts, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash ranks 16 of 152 models on sale for summarising without inventing things, and factual answers, against 38 for Qwen3.8-Max (0902).

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8-Max (0902) or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8-Max (0902).

Run Qwen3.8-Max (0902) and Gemini 3.5 Flash on your own prompt

Benchmarks aren't your data. Try both side by side in the playground, with the cost of every answer.

Try the playgroundTalk to us