Compare / Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Mistral Large 4
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Mistral Large 4
55 results from 3 sources that measured both models. Each row is in the source's own units; there is no overall winner.
| Benchmark | Metric | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 3.0% | 1.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Claims to check% of products | 1.2% | 3.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 93.6% | 95.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 3.6% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 1.8% | 3.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 7.7% | 10.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 0.0% | 1.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 84.5% | 80.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 4.52 | 3.69 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 19.6% | 17.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 2.4% | 1.8% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel compliance% of products | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Channel rules broken% of products | 0.6% | 3.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Claims to check% of products | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Conflicts caught% of conflicts | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Content quality% of checks | 94.2% | 96.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Cost per productUS dollars | $0.0256 | $0.0033 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Decision accuracy% of decisions | 93.3% | 93.1% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Failed outputs% of products | 3.6% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Field accuracy% of missing fields | 90.3% | 94.4% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Invented values% of filled values | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Missing UK information% of products | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Not findable% of products | 3.6% | 4.2% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Publish-ready listings% of products | 50.0% | 39.9% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Reliably publish-ready% of products | 28.6% | 10.7% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claimsclaims per product | 0.69 | 0.91 |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of products | 26.8% | 33.3% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong attributes% of products | 21.4% | 19.6% |
| CatalogBenchmeasured by us | Wrong category or variant% of products | 1.8% | 1.2% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Accurate decks% of tasks | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Caveat dropped% of tasks | 16.7% | 16.7% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Clean layout% of tasks | 66.7% | 33.3% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Cost per deckUS dollars | $0.15 | $0.0148 |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Deck ratingrating | 1,112 | 515 |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Design quality% of the maximum | 67.0% | 30.5% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Draft figure quoted% of tasks | 33.3% | 16.7% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Findings missing% of tasks | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Head-to-head win rate% of comparisons | 63.5% | 10.7% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Layout defects% of tasks | 33.3% | 66.7% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Misleading metric used% of tasks | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Presentable decks% of tasks | 33.3% | 0.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Recommendation late or wrong% of tasks | 0.0% | 83.3% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Slides needing work% of tasks | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported claims% of tasks | 16.7% | 50.0% |
| DeckBenchmeasured by us | Unsupported numbers% of tasks | 0.0% | 33.3% |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Audience scorescore out of 100 | 39.7 | 55.8 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Business scorescore out of 100 | 15.6 | 34.2 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Consistency scorescore out of 100 | 19.2 | 16.7 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Contribution profitsimulated US dollars | $99,775 | $533,401 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Cost of a runUS dollars | $0.73 | $0.0657 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Months over budgetmonths of 12 | 2 | 0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Overall scorescore out of 100 | 25.4 | 37.0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Planning scorescore out of 100 | 54.8 | 55.0 |
| ROASBenchmeasured by us | Return on ad spendprofit per $1 spent | $0.09 | $0.45 |
Bold green marks the better value on that metric. Where a source reports ranges that overlap, the difference may not be meaningful; see the benchmark page for ranges.